A flood of students scurry into your classroom, hurried and shushed. It’s 11:20, twenty minutes after class’s scheduled beginning.

The professor has just walked in.

The students stand up and address the professor as Sir or Madam.

Every day I lose more faith in India’s higher education system. The University of Hyderabad is ranked number 1 in India as a postgraduate institution. But contrast this ranking to actual University academics and you get a much different image. In class, Some students have a maturity level similar to high school students. Male and female students frequently sit separate. Students pass notes in class and do not engage the professor. There is little real discussion in class, and this is a graduate level University. Students are receiving their Ph. D and their masters degrees, but often do not seem ready for such critical thinking. I must emphasize that many students are mature and competent and these issues are not the fault of the students, but rather a result of the structure of Higher Education here.

Professors do not help much for education. Here is a line for line quote from my Dalit Politics Professor in a 500 level second year masters course.

“it’s a fragmenting, it’s a fragmenting, fragmenting, fragmenting if you talk of inequality you can talk of inequality within the dominant class, but a graded graded inequality it’s a political social that graded inequality. That graded inequality is the one, secondly. It is not the division of labor. Division of labor is a universal. Division of labor, division of laborers is different, division of laborers is different my friends, it’s a very theoretical. So that division of labor. Graded inequality. …it’s a labor that is continues laborers, it is a ‘laterlite’ situation. It’s a compartments, it’s a vertical, not a horizontal. It’s a very interesting that ambedkar formulation. To get a the caste system annihilation, of caste theory it is a very two thing, the two things are simplistic.“

Not entirely sure what he was getting at with this thought.

In Women’s History in India we have started presenting seminar papers. On our first day, three students presented their papers. Each went up to the podium, opened their papers and read. Monotone, droning thick accent. They did not look up once. They did not make eye contact. Atrocious English. After each reading our Professor berated the class for not discussing the paper. I’d be surprised if any of the students would respond, either they were passing notes in class (which happens) or did not undertsand a word, like us.

Critical thinking among the majority of Indian students is lacking. Here Education is frequently based on wrote memorization so students can repeat information and dates back but cannot analyze information and readings. This difference of focus from the western system reflects itself in grading exams and emphasis in class.